PDF for Workshop 6
What kind of professional development for math and science teachers
will really make a difference?
a variety of professional development strategies that are based on
the idea of collaboration and reflection. Teachers work together to
help each other improve their practice in teaching math and science.
We suggest that
you read the following articles, included in the Appendix at the back
of this Guide, prior to viewing Workshop 6:
"Peer-to-Peer professional development"
Chair, Barbara Alcala at Whittier High School in Whittier, CA, describes
how she encouraged two math teachers to lead a staff meeting about
how to use white boardsdry-erase tablets that are large enough for
a cooperative group of four or five students to use together, but
small enough to be easily managed in the classroom. Teachers brainstorm
their ideas for how they could use white boards to enhance group work
in math. They provide each other with constructive criticism for applying
these ideas to the classroom and leave not only with a set of white
boards and markers to take back to their students, but a list of ideas
from their peers.
author and education researcher Nancy Love about several principles
she believes are important for professional development for math and
BambinoCFG's for Teachers
"Critical Friends Groups and changing practice"
science teacher Deborah Bambino teaches at Central East Middle School
in Philadelphia, an urban school under the current leadership of principal
Wendy Shapiro. Deborah presents a lesson about mixing cold and warm
air masses that is part of a new curriculum she is piloting. Immediately
after school she presents the activity to her Critical Friends Group,
a cross-disciplinary group of educators who meet regularly to examine
each others' practice and provide feedback. After hearing their comments,
Deborah returns to the classroom the next day and makes changes in
the lesson for a new group of students.
HernandezWhittier High School
"Peer observations and mentoring in changing practice"
High School in Whittier, CA, Principal Al Castillo and lead teachers
Kirsten Leoniak and Dina Leslie helped start a peer mentoring program.
Together, Al and three teachers from different disciplines observe
a math class taught by Adam Hernandez. Later, Adam receives feedback
from his peers, followed by a one-on-one meeting with the principal.
Site Discussion Questions
(remember to choose a Structure from those listed
on pages 12 to 14)
- How can
the principal provide the time and resources for adequate professional
development for teachers?
- Who should
lead math and science professional development? Why?
- Do peer
coaching models really work? Why? Why not?
- How can
I assess the need for professional development in my school?
- What is
the most effective professional development strategy you've used?
- When do
you lead professional development and when do others?
- How do you
use staff meeting time and other existing structures?
- What are
ways to give teachers the big picture so that they can make informed
decisions about professional development?
- Is it sufficient
to work only with math and science teachers or should/can all
teachers be involved?
- How can
the principal promote the value of changing math and science education
in the school?
- If teachers
learn well collaboratively in groups, should those groups be across
disciplines or should math and science teachers be separate?
Caccia. P. F."Linguistic
Coaching: Helping Beginning Teachers Defeat Discouragement."
Educational Leadership 536. 6 (1996): 17-20.
Cain, R. W.,
P. A. Kenney and C. G. Scholemer. "Teachers as Assessors: A Professional
Development Challenge." Professional Development for Teachers
of Mathematics, 1994 Yearbook, Ed. D.B. Aichele and A.
F. Cosford. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics,
F. and J. Robles."Project IMPACT: Increasing the Mathematical
Power of All Children and Teachers." Reflecting on Our Work:
NSF Teacher Enhancement in K-6 Mathematics. Eds. S.N. Friel and
G.S. Bright. Lanham, MD: U P of America, Inc. 1997: 179-86.
P. et. al. "Study Groups: The Productive 'Whole'." Journal
of Staff Development 16. 3 (1995): 50-52.
and P. Clark. "Whole-Faculty Study Groups at Sweetwater Union
High School." Journal of Staff Development 16. 3 (1995):
Conger, J. The
Charismatic Leader: Behind the Mystique of Exceptional Leadership.
San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1989.
Mathematics: Supporting Discourse in Elementary School Classrooms."
Reflecting on Our Work: NSF Teacher Enhancement in K-6 Mathematics.
Eds. S.N. Friel and G.S. Bright. Lanham, MD: U P of America, 1997:
Costa, A. and
R. Garmston. Cognitive Coaching: Approaching Renaissance Schools.
Norwood, MA: Christopher Gordon, 1994.
Costa, A. and
B. Kallick. "Through the Lens of a Critical Friend."
Educational Leadership 51. 3 (1993): 49-51.
L. "Teacher Learning that Supports Student Learning." Educational
Leadership Feb. 1998, 6-11.
and D. Bryant. Getting Started with Teachers. Mathematical
Sciences Education Board, National Research Council. Washington, DC,
"When Teachers Look at Students Work." Educational Leadership
50. 5 (1993): 71-72.
T. P. Carpenter and M. L. Franke. "Cognitively Guided Instruction
(CGI)." Reflecting on Our Work: NSF Teacher Enhancement in
K-6 Mathematics. Eds. S.N. Friel and G.W. Bright, Lanham, MD:
U P of America, 1997: 193-6.
Mentors of Beginning Teachers: An Overview for Staff Developers."
Journal of Staff Development 17. 4 (1996): 8-11.
"How Administrators Support Peer Coaching." Educational
Leadership 44. 5 (1987): 18-28.
The Quality School Teacher, Harper Perennial Library, 1998.
Kruse, S., K.
Seashore Louis, and A. Bryk. . Building Professional Community
in Schools. Madison, WI: Center on Organization and Restructuring
of Schools, U of Wisconsin, Spring 1994.
et al. "Whole-Faculty Study Groups: Building the Capacity for
Change through Interagency Collaboration." Journal of Staff
Development 16 (3) 1995: 45-47.
and M. W. McLaughlin. "Networks for Educational Change: Powerful
and Problematic." Phi Delta Kappan 73 . 9 (1992): 673-677.
Little, J. W.
"Teachers as Colleagues." Schools as Collaborative Culture:
Creating the Culture Now. Ed. A. Lieberman. Bristol, PA: Falmer
Little, J. W.
"The Persistence of Privacy: Autonomy and Initiative in Teachers'
Professional Relations." Teachers College Record 91. 4
"Teachers' Professional Development in a Climate of Educational
Reform." Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 15.
2 (1993): 129-151.
S., et al. Continuing to Learn: A Guidebook for Teacher Development.
Andover, MA: The Regional Laboratory for Educational Improvement
of the Northeast and Islands and Oxford, OH: National Staff Development
S., et al. Designing Professional Development for Teachers of Science
and Mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, 1998.
G.O., E. S. Sussman and E. Meltzer. "The North Shore Collaborative
Inquiry Project: A Reflective Study of Assessment and Learning. Journal
of Staff Development 16. 4 (1995): 46-51.
M. W. and I. Oberman, Teacher Learning: New Policies, New Practices.
New York: Teachers College Press, 1996.
M. W., J. E. Talbert, and N. Bascia. Eds. The Context of Teaching
in Secondary Schools: Teachers' Realities. New York: Teachers
College Press. 1990.
Murphy, C. "Whole-Faculty
Study Groups: Doing the Seemingly Undoable." Journal of Staff
Development 16. 3 (1995): 71-74.
Murphy, C. "Study
Groups Foster Schoolwide Learning." Educational Leadership
50. 3 (1992): 71-74.
on Teaching and America's Future. What Matters Most: Teaching for
America's Future. New York: 1996.
et al. Mentoring: A Resource and Training Guide for Educators.
Andover, MA: The Regional Laboratory for Educational Improvement of
the Northeast and Islands, 1994.
and C. D. Glickman. "Peer Coaching: Developmental Approach to
Enhancing Teacher Thinking." Journal of Staff Development
12. 2 (1991): 20-25.
Roy, P. A
Primer on Study Groups. Wilmington, DE: Patricia Roy, 1994
and R. Gower. The Skillful Teacher: Building Your Teaching Skills.
Research for Better Teaching, 1997.
and B. Joyce. "The Evolution of Peer Coaching." Educational
Leadership 53. 6 (1996): 12-16.
J. and J. A. Colbert The Mentor Teacher Casebook. Eugene, OR:
ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management, U of Oregon and San
Francisco: Far West Laboratory.1987.
and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform." Harvard Educational
Review 57, 1987: 1-22.
Stein, M. K.
and M. Smith. In press. "The Mathematical Tasks Framework as
a Tool for Reflection." Mathematics Teaching in the Middle
Turner, P. "Study
Groups at Sarah Cobb Elementary." Journal of Staff Development
16. 3 (1995): 53.
2061 Professional Development Program. Internet Address: http://project2061.aaas.org/Pdp/challeng.html
for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Internet Address: http://www.ascd.org/
Internet Address: http://www.edweek.org/tsb/index.html?intc=thed
Clearinghouse Professional Development site. Internet Address: http://my.goenc.com/search/?page=1&pagelength=10&resultType=search&searchText=%22reform+ideas%22
Quality Program. Internet Address: http://project2061.aaas.org/newsinfo/earlychild/fostering/copleyp.htm
NCTM Professional Development. Internet Address:
(Science, Math and Related Technology.) Internet Address: http://teachingsmart.org/description.html
Guided Instruction Project. Directed by Elizabeth Fennema and Thomas
P. Carpenter, U of Wisconsin at Madison, Madison, WI.
Integrated Science Teacher Enhancement Project (CC-ISTEP). Paul Kuerbis,
Project Director, Colorado Springs, CO 719- 389-6147.
Science (GSS). Lawrence Hall of Science, Berkeley, CA: 510-642-9635.
Development Council (NSDC), for information on professional development
in peer coaching and mentoring. Oxford. OH: 513-523-6029.