In Search of the Novel:Teacher-TalkNovel
Subject: Re: QuestionFrom: Cindy O'Donnell-Allen (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Wed Mar 22 2000 - 14:34:34 EST
- Next message: Swann, Peggy: "RE: Question"
- Previous message: Cindy O'Donnell-Allen: "Re: Technology question"
- Maybe in reply to: Andrea Martine: "Question"
- Next in thread: Swann, Peggy: "RE: Question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Andrea raises a really compelling question below. My response to it, however, are more questions: Do these points have to be either/or? In other words, how can we hook kids on the idea of voluntarily reading a *range* of texts (classic works and other complex texts included)?
Andrea Martine wrote:
> Many literature teachers in junior high and high schools say that the
> crucial point is to hook students on reading. Others say that the crucial
> point is to have students read classic literature. The two groups often
> disagree. What do all of you think about this point? Andrea
Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii;
Content-Description: Card for Cindy O'Donnell-Allen
n:O'Donnell-Allen, Ph. D.;Cindy
org:Colorado State University;Department of English
adr:;;359 Eddy Building;Fort Collins;CO;80523-1773;
fn:Cindy O'Donnell-Allen, Ph. D.