Teacher resources and professional development across the curriculum

Teacher professional development and classroom resources across the curriculum

Monthly Update sign up
Mailing List signup
Search
MENU
Science in Focus: Force and Motion
About the Workshops
1. Making an Impact
2. Drag
Races
3. When Rubber
Meets the Road
5. Keep on
Rolling
6. Force Against Force
7. The Lure of
Magnetism
MouseLab
Questionnaire
Supplemental
Resource List




Channel-Talk

To post a question or reply, you can send an email to channel-talkforce@learner.org.

From: Leslie Marra (lgmarra@bellsouth.net)
Date: Tue Jun 25 2002 - 18:59:36 EDT

  • Next message: Leslie Marra: "Re: [Channel-talkforce] workshop #5"

    Did you receive this other reply to your first email?: Karen, I cannot
    think of a way other than arrows to visually represent forces. The length
    of the arrow gives a visual of the magnitude of the force. Perhaps if the
    forces were labeled with words in parenthesis on top of the arrows? Or
    maybe if the measured amount (Newtons) of each force were labeled for each
    arrow?
    I think the most important aspect of understanding this notion of balanced
    and unbalanced forces lies in the actual experience with the ball and the
    track.
    See if these words makes sense, draw pictures to help yourself.:
      When the ball sits on the horizontal track, the forces are balanced. That
    is, the weight of the ball (pull gravity x mass of ball) is equal to the
    force of the track holding up the ball. The forces are both perpendicular
    to the track and acting in concert on the center of mass of the ball as
    well.
      When the ball sits still on the horizontal track the NET FORCE is 0
    (zero); because the pulling down force of gravity (on the ball) is exactly
    equal to the pushing up force of the track (on the ball). Also, there are
    no forces acting side to side on the ball at this point. NET force is the
    force "leftover" if you combine all of the directional forces.
      When the track tilts the pushing up force of the track no longer pushes
    perpendicular to the track, no longer exactly opposite to the pulling down
    force of gravity. The shift in angle of the center of mass combined with
    the consistent pull of gravity causes a shift in energy from the pushing up
    force of the track to the pulling force of gravity, or in effect - the ball.
      Note the significance of "center of mass" as pointed out in the workshop.
      Here's what I wrote (drew) in my notes:

    (1) In this situation, balanced forces meant zero net force and a still
    ball.
    Things change when the track is tilted:
    (2) Forces on the (center of [mass] of the) ball are no longer balanced.
    (3) When the perpendicular line drawn downward from the center of [gravity]
    is no longer perpendicular to the track, the forces on the object are
    unbalanced.
    (4) Keep in mind the thought of "center of mass". The forces are acting on
    the center of mass.
    (5) Tilting the track in effect lessens the pushing up force the track has
    on the ball; however, the pulling down force of gravity stays the same.
    (6) Forces don't just disappear: In effect, the pushing up force lost by
    the track is gained by the pulling down force of gravity, gravity "wins" and
    the ball rolls down.

    The "reason" there is more net force on the ball than on the track once the
    track is tilted is the ball's center of mass has been thrown off balance and
    gravity is pulling down on the ball harder than the track is pushing up.

    The principles of potential and kinetic energy and inertia are in play here
    as well.
    ********
    Can you better explain the unbalanced forces again with respect to moving
    objects? I know they can be balanced (even though my misconception logic
    says otherwise) but I am still not sure I understand HOW or WHY.

    The simplest explanation I can give is: An object moves BECAUSE an
    imbalance of forces has occured. And, only an imbalance of forces can alter
    the movement of an object in motion or at rest.

    I also made an observation: At least via the video coverage available, both
    the cameraperson and the teachers have spent more time (except in the 6th
    workshop classroom) with the all-boy groups, as well as allowing more boys
    to speak during the class discussions. As a psychologist I actually do not
    find this surprising, just continually interesting, given the research in
    this area. I wonder of anyone else noticed this?

    Actually, I thought I noticed some interesting gender bias issues as well -
    and wondered if I had done the same in my classroom! It seemed the 6th
    workshop classroom had more heterogeneously grouped "groups", which would
    make it difficult to focus on boy groups. I've noticed more boys getting
    called on, and more boys' ideas/suggestions being pursued than girls. I am
    also taking another ACPB workshop called "The Next Move", and have noticed
    similar concerns in those videoes. I have witnessed serious bias/favoritism
    incidents in my teaching experience, and do not see these as such. My
    perception is that the female teachers in these workshop series have no idea
    they're favoring the boys slightly; however, I do wonder if the little girls
    are conciously aware of it.


  • © Annenberg Foundation 2014. All rights reserved. Legal Policy