|
 |  | Books Branden, C., and J. Tooze. 1998. Introduction to protein structure. New York: Garland Press.
A non-technical introduction to protein structure.
Ezzell, Carol. 2002. Scientific American: Beyond the human genome. An e-book that describes the new biology after the human genome.
Articles DeFrancesco, L. 2002. Probing protein interactions. The Scientist 16[8]:28. Researchers have found them by the thousands, but what do these interactions mean? Ezzell, C. 2002. Proteins rule. Scientific American 286:40–48. Biotech’s latest mantra is “proteomics,” as it focuses on how dynamic networks of human proteins control cells and tissues. Hollon, T. 2002. Software zeroes in on ovarian cancer. The Scientist 16[8]:16. A proteomic fingerprint with unprecedented diagnostic accuracy becomes a new kind of disease biomarker. Hopkin, K. 2001. The post-genome project. Scientific American 285:16. Whether the human proteome will be successfully mapped in three years depends upon how you define “proteome.” Lewis, R. 2002. Fighting the 10/90 gap. The Scientist 16[10]:22. Initiative targets the most neglected diseases; how scientists can help. McCook, A. 2002. Lifting the screen. Scientific American 286:16–17. An accurate test is not always the best way to find cancer. Sinclair, B. 2001. Software solutions to proteomics problems. The Scientist 15[20]:26. Researchers find programs to aid every step of research. Smutzer, G. 2001. Yeast: An attractive, yet simple model. The Scientist 15[18]:24. Researchers use whole genome strategies to characterize unknown genes in yeast. Stix, G. 1999. Parsing cells. Scientific American 287:36. Proteomics is an attempt to devise industrial-scale techniques to map the identity and activities of all the proteins in a cell. |  | |