![]() | |||
| 2. Learning As We Grow - Development and Learning Script James P. Comer, M.D., Yale University: There is the physical, the social interactive, the psycho-emotional, ethical, linguistic, intellectual cognitive. And it is development along all of those lines thats really important. Up until recently, the school focused on the linguistic and the intellectual cognitive. But it is growth along all those developmental pathways that is important. Linda Darling-Hammond: Good teachers start where their students are and build upon what they are able to do. But how do we know what our students are ready for and when? The concept of the zone of proximal development helps us here. Roland Tharp, Ph.D, University of California, Santa Cruz: The zone is an important concept because to teachers its absolutely vital, because it helps the teacher understand what is the basic act of teaching. And that is this to locate that point in the zone of proximal development in which this learner needs the assistance and then to provide it. Good teaching means constantly stretching, moving, rising in the developmental process, and that means always providing more assistance. Linda Darling-Hammond: Psychologist Jerome Bruner described a spiral curriculum that returns to important concepts at different stages when children can understand them more deeply. In this half hour we will see three teachers guide their students through an increasingly sophisticated understanding of momentum. They provide wonderful examples of developmentally appropriate teaching. (classroom scene) Fe MacLean: This morning is just an introduction of several cycles which will help them understand concepts of motion, for example, uh, the relation of weight, or mass, with speed, the relation of incline, of a ramp to speed and momentum, or the relation of weight with momentum. (classroom scene) Fe MacLean: For these age of children it is necessary that the material is chosen so that they see not just the, the abstract time but they see it with their own eyes how the ball rolls down the ramp. So I have a six-foot ramp instead of a small ramp because I want to make sure the numbers are big enough to see a differences with the children . (classroom scene) Fe MacLean: I want to make sure that in their participation they are very clear of what we would call controlling of variables. We would call it fair, so that it starts from the same place, and we time it the same time until the end. (classroom scene) Fe MacLean: When we made the graphic organizer that I used while we were taking down the data that the children are writing in there, that is a very abstract way of representing what we were doing, so thats no longer concrete. When I plan my activities or units of study, I make the activities or the context rich enough so that it will benefit the children who are quite competent and those, the children who are not quite so competent in certain areas. (classroom scene) Fe MacLean : I want to make sure that children who have, are close to mastery will be able to have tasks that will them to be to that mastery and in their interaction with the children who are just entering the zone they will solidify or stabilize their competence, and the children who are entering will advance and become more stable in that zone. (classroom scene) Fe MacLean (interview): Hopefully in the next investigation they will be at an even higher level and in the zone its advanced. The next thing were going to do is, is to look at all of their drawings and what they wrote and their conclusions of how many seconds it took for the balls to go down the ramp. So they will discuss that, which is part of oral language and literacy. (classroom scene) Fe MacLean: When they have to write it down they really have to think about it, and thats what we want the children to do, not just in science, but to understand informational text, which is what they really wrote this information about what they did. (classroom scene) Fe MacLean: When we use the long ramp, thats a physical symbol of reality, which is the hill. So I think of that as a concrete operational tool, and it is a symbolic tool, its a physical tool representing something. When we made the representation of that ramp, and the children drew illustrations of that, that then became a higher level of symbolic tools inter
a graphic illustration or a graphic representation. Which they did on their paper and on the chalkboard. (classroom scene) Fe MacLean: From my experience children are not going to be able look at the data using numbers of measurement to really understand the concept in this context of the level of the ramp relative to the momentum, and that is how far the can will move
(classroom scene) Fe MacLean: The tracing is more pictorial and is more appropriate to their age. (classroom scene) Fe MacLean: I tried to relate it to a to a form of a story, a narrative that hopefully can relate to their own lives, for me to understand or to assess their understanding the concepts. In one instance, for example, two children working together
(classroom scene) Fe MacLean:
They drew this picture where one of them won the race with a snowboard, and the other one got a bronze metal according to him, because he started from a lower hill so he couldnt go as fast, and the other child who started on a higher hill went faster. So to me they are understanding that the height of a ramp, or the steepness is related to momentum or speed in this case. Linda Darling-Hammond: Fe MacLean finds many different ways to assist individual students within their zones of proximal development. (classroom scene) George Mixon: I just wanted them to look at a piece in calculating the acceleration of a free falling object, getting the speed of that object, graphing that information and collecting data and putting it in an organized manner into a data table. (classroom scene) George Mixon: With this age group you have to start these kids off with something thats a little more concrete and more solid for them to understand and then you can kind of branch them off into the abstract and get them to formulate ideas and almost, what I call taking intellectual risks. (classroom scene) George Mixon: I think I started them with the ramp primarily because its kind of like, most of these kids sled, they all snowboard. (classroom scene) George Mixon: I toss a lot of variables at the kids because I think one of the goals as a scientist is that theyre going to be bombarded with variables that will hinder experiments or procedural steps, and they have to learn how to control those and identify what is an independent and whats dependent variable. (classroom scene) George Mixon: I think when they, when they realize that, they can say I need to control this, control this, control this, to test for just the one thing that I need to test for. (classroom scene) George Mixon: If I gave them the table, they dont think. They need to be able to figure out ways in which to formulate and organize their information. That shows me how well theyre thinking. (classroom scene) (classroom scene) George Mixon: I think if you can get kids active, and motivated, and involved, and get their hands in stuff, theyre focused. I think thats what kind of pulls them in and kind of gets them motivated, plus just knowing who they are and having a relationship with them. (classroom scene) George Mixon: I sometime have to go outside my realm, and you know, the kids have to understand too, that there some, they can be flexible in their thought process, and formulating data tables, because not every kid is going to think alike. (classroom scene) George Mixon: Kids have unique ways in which to organize information and collect data and control certain variables. Its just a matter of how well theyre able to collaborate with a group to come up with that ultimate goal. (classroom scene) George Mixon: I just kind of wanted to see if they could make that transition and see that connection, and I think some of them did. But I still, there is something that something that you have to revisit to make sure that they understand it. Linda Darling-Hammond: George Mixon pushes his students' thinking by asking questions that get them to analyze data and test their hunches with one another. Roland Tharp: Vygotsky pointed out that that kind of assistance that will help development in the zone can come from more capable peers. It doesnt really matter where the assistance comes from. And the most competent teachers, I think, provide the assistance themselves when they need to, make sure that a good, rich diet of assistance is available from other class members, and outside resources, and the web, and wherever assistance can be provided to make sure thats available to the student. Thats the orchestration of excellent teaching. Linda Darling-Hammond: At the Detroit High School for the Performing Arts, Ken Gillams physics students study the same concepts, drawing on even higher levels of abstract reasoning. Through experimentation they move into evaluating evidence, drawing inferences, and predicting outcomes. Ken Gillam: I started what I knew as prior knowledge for them. We had done situations, we worked in situations where they had the opportunity to evaluate velocity, acceleration of a ball rolling on a ramp. Ken Gillam: Their initial thought was, its going to be the same lab again, well, it really wasnt going to be the same lab again, because the minute I put a barrier there and crashed it, they said this is not going to be the same. So the hook was I think its going to be, no its not. And so I hooked them by getting, giving them something they knew, but then giving them something new to look at. (classroom scene) Ken Gillam: They are ready to go into college
But in a lot of ways they are still just kids and they like to see things that happen. (classroom scene) Ken Gillam: So if you give them something on a concrete basis, this is concrete, you can take this car, you can roll it down this ramp, and you can make informational observations, you can collect data, you can use that data to develop information that is solid, meaningful in a problem solving sense. (classroom scene) Ken Gillam (interview): Girl: It moved back a little. Ken Gillam: Once you see them beginning to fall into this pattern that says were all beginning to get this, then its time to challenge them again. Move them up a level. (classroom scene) Ken Gillam : So you take the solid concrete, then you take them into the problem solving area and into the analytical, analyze what youve seen. Then, once you begin to analyze it, how are you going to use this information in a real world? How do you build this meta skills of thinking? How do you think in a broader context? (classroom scene) Ken Gillam: And you begin to put together a structure, a pattern into not only abstract, but into, not only being able to bring it all together and synthesize something that may be totally unique in their analysis. James Comer: And so understanding that you are really an instrument of learning, and that you can help the child grow all the developmental pathways, and that growth along all the developmental pathways is what makes academic learning most possible. If you can think that, then you will find all kinds of opportunities to help children grow, and develop, and learn, both what it takes to be successful in school and as an adult, and to get the academic material they need to be successful as adults. Linda Darling-Hammond: Fe MacLean, George Mixon and Ken Gillam taught similar concepts using similar materials, but adapted their lessons to the developmental needs of their students.They created intellectual challenges to support increasingly complex thinking. Return to the Support Materials for Session 2 |
| ||